I’m a privileged white guy passing judgment on everyone’s endorsement of lethal violence in defense of property. (UPDATE: Politico notes that "The company also barred individuals from retweeting Trump's post but only after it had been shared more than 23,000 times. The question centers on a different type of insulin than most diabetics are currently prescribed. I think it is highly likely business owners are looking for an insurance windfall. To the contrary, such unrest usually needs a “whiff of grapeshot” but sadly seldom gets it. Lots of possibilities of legal shootings there. ii. The property under threat has not changed. Call up, explain your background, and tell them you feel like your expertise is missing the practical experience piece. No police necessary. Why so defensive? Oh, Bullshit. All rights reserved. So if I can dish it I need to take it. In an emailed statement, Becton’s spokesperson told Snopes: “We evaluate all possible factors in reviewing whether or not to file criminal charges. iii. We could have saved the lives of 100,000 Americans if Trump listened to the scientist, who vote overwhelmingly Democrat by the way. Under Florida law I can head shoot an arsonist attempting to burn said chicken house from 500 yards away and am acting 100% within the law. It’s a good question, but you mistakenly conflate government with Joe Packer, in his private defensive capacity. Technically speaking if you are in the process of trying to set my house on fire in Florida I can kill you with a scoped rifle from 1000 yards away and be completely within the law even though you pose no danger to my life or anyone elses. I am not sure you understand what Section 230 does now. This, in modern times, is seldom allowed, and then, only when authorized by the commander or chief officer, at the place where the pillage is committed… But over the last few weeks Democrats seem to have changed their tune, at least on the surface. The “man” was a looter endangering life and safety and only 1 juror needs to be so convinced. Right wing violence is a scourge on the soul of American. PILLAGE. Whatever the level is that stops the riot and no more. ), RT @sistertoldjah: My latest at @LegInsurrection -->> House Speaker Nancy Pelosi Suddenly Decides Riots and Looting Aren’t “Peaceful Demons…, RT @mathewsjw: Horrific Polling After Billions in property losses: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi Suddenly Decides Riots and Looting Aren’t “Pe…, Horrific Polling After Billions in property losses: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi Suddenly Decides Riots and Looting A… https://t.co/UHgkQbEaEi, #HouseSpeaker #NancyPelosi Suddenly Decides #Riots and #Looting Aren’t “#PeacefulDemonstrations” https://t.co/GZ9U7CvvPh, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi Suddenly Decides Riots and Looting Aren’t “Peaceful Demonstrations” https://t.co/GEXfaAZSTC, My latest at @LegInsurrection -->> House Speaker Nancy Pelosi Suddenly Decides Riots and Looting Aren’t “Peaceful D… https://t.co/ih04h7kzfu, RT @LegInsurrection: House Speaker Nancy Pelosi Suddenly Decides Riots and Looting Aren’t “Peaceful Demonstrations” https://t.co/P3OaVf3QV6, nazi #PelosiBlowout suddenly decides that #BLMAntifaTerroristsThugs are no longer 'peaceful protests.' So shoot first, before they have time to turn their back to you. You may or may not be surprised to know this…but I don’t have any property worth getting the police involved for. Frankly, so what? But laws against looting, I think, are even more clearly backed by the threat that someone, whether police or otherwise, will shoot. In this way, some of the looting is a lashing-out against capitalism, the police, and other forces that are seen as perpetuating racism. If Joe wants to defend property during a riot, quite often, Joe has no choice except to start killing people.